i think the resolution is too high

i subscribed to national geograpic magazine because there was a free digital camera, which they advertised to be good for 'capturing pictures of nature.'

i only subscribed for the camera because i'm a damn cheapskate asshole.

the camera came in the mail yesterday, and i finally got to test it today because i didn't have batteries.

the camera's 'hi-resolution' images are at 352x288 pixels. my phone's crappy camera shoots at 640x480 pixels.

so i conclude that the camera is worse than a damn toy and i couldn't see a damn thing from the images. national geograpic is so poor that they have to resort to such trickery to get sad people like me to subscribe.



photographs of nature indeed.


now playing
hate me! - children of bodom