lies
in this day and age, i really do get confused as to what a bf/gf status really mean. does it happen when you like someone? or when you're in love (what’s this word worth anyway?)? or is there a certain point when it just HAS to happen? what do you guys think?
i think that it was meant to be a special thing, but that kinda got diluted by modern standards. after all, we're living in a time where people are getting into relationships here and there, perhaps even several at the same time.
i know guys who have girlfriends and get don't give a second thought of fucking other girls. i know girls who lie endlessly to their boyfriends and then try to blame everything on the guys when things go wrong. obviously it applies both ways.
is there a point in this? having a boy/girlfriend is clearly not worth a shit. so if it's not that, then what do we have here? why do people still place such great emphasis on this? is it just a mere formality, to serve as a notice to family and friends of their joyful union (that may only last a week or two)? or is it a booking of this person, a hands-off label to potential suitors?
i may be silly, but i do think that a relationship is so much more than just having a status. and in a sense it is perhaps even better to NOT have any, since it always seems to create more conflict and division than anything else.
couples should only be bound by their feelings and loyalty, and this status will serve as an unnecessary psychological barrier, such that they will try to stretch their relationship beyond breaking point just for the sake of 'us'. in the end they'll destroy each other in trying to be together when they would've been better-off being alone.
how many couples do you know of who are clearly unloving, fighting all the time and yet maintain this status? if it wasn't there, they'd just go their separate ways and be happier.
i don't know where it came from, but i have this notion that when a relationship attains this bf/gf status, it no longer belongs to just the couple but instead enters into the public domain. in announcing their union, it officially becomes Everyone's business and this can never be a good thing.
a relationship should only belong to the two involved, and when everyone wants a piece of it, there won't be enough to go around. sure, you can say that it will not affect you, but it WILL, and there's no way around that. there will be a time when they're only staying together for the public eye and that's when they'll die.
we should only be bound by feelings and loyalty. if one party thinks that there's nothing left and it's time to leave, then go ahead. there's nothing holding them back and that's the way it should be.
obviously my ideologies have turned right around and bit me in the ass, but i still truly believe in this. there's no point in carrying on if anyone is unhappy.
29/09/09, 12.11am
i think that it was meant to be a special thing, but that kinda got diluted by modern standards. after all, we're living in a time where people are getting into relationships here and there, perhaps even several at the same time.
i know guys who have girlfriends and get don't give a second thought of fucking other girls. i know girls who lie endlessly to their boyfriends and then try to blame everything on the guys when things go wrong. obviously it applies both ways.
is there a point in this? having a boy/girlfriend is clearly not worth a shit. so if it's not that, then what do we have here? why do people still place such great emphasis on this? is it just a mere formality, to serve as a notice to family and friends of their joyful union (that may only last a week or two)? or is it a booking of this person, a hands-off label to potential suitors?
i may be silly, but i do think that a relationship is so much more than just having a status. and in a sense it is perhaps even better to NOT have any, since it always seems to create more conflict and division than anything else.
couples should only be bound by their feelings and loyalty, and this status will serve as an unnecessary psychological barrier, such that they will try to stretch their relationship beyond breaking point just for the sake of 'us'. in the end they'll destroy each other in trying to be together when they would've been better-off being alone.
how many couples do you know of who are clearly unloving, fighting all the time and yet maintain this status? if it wasn't there, they'd just go their separate ways and be happier.
i don't know where it came from, but i have this notion that when a relationship attains this bf/gf status, it no longer belongs to just the couple but instead enters into the public domain. in announcing their union, it officially becomes Everyone's business and this can never be a good thing.
a relationship should only belong to the two involved, and when everyone wants a piece of it, there won't be enough to go around. sure, you can say that it will not affect you, but it WILL, and there's no way around that. there will be a time when they're only staying together for the public eye and that's when they'll die.
we should only be bound by feelings and loyalty. if one party thinks that there's nothing left and it's time to leave, then go ahead. there's nothing holding them back and that's the way it should be.
obviously my ideologies have turned right around and bit me in the ass, but i still truly believe in this. there's no point in carrying on if anyone is unhappy.
29/09/09, 12.11am
24 Comments:
makes sense... my lecturer once asked what's marriage to each of us. There were many answers:
a promise to forever love
a celebration of love
a legal status as a couple
a start to building a family
Thinking of it... a celebration of love makes more sense to the word LOVE than the rest.
By dqb, at September 30, 2009 2:36 am
generic alprazolam buy xanax legally - xanax withdrawal emergency
By Anonymous, at November 13, 2012 5:45 am
cheap lorazepam ativan extended release - where to buy ativan online
By Anonymous, at November 13, 2012 5:46 am
diazepam 5mg effects of valium and alcohol mixed - valium purchase no prescription
By Anonymous, at November 13, 2012 9:01 am
buy alprazolam online no prescription xanax effects pregnant women - drug screen for xanax
By Anonymous, at November 13, 2012 6:48 pm
buy valium 5mg valium enough - buy roche valium line
By Anonymous, at November 13, 2012 8:00 pm
lorazepam online online lorazepam prices - ativan 773
By Anonymous, at November 13, 2012 8:44 pm
where to buy ambien online ambien side effects hallucinations - mail order ambien cr
By Anonymous, at November 13, 2012 11:05 pm
valium diazepam buy diazepam online usa only - buy diazepam bangkok
By Anonymous, at November 14, 2012 2:13 pm
buy ativan online ativan pictures - best place buy ativan
By Anonymous, at November 14, 2012 2:46 pm
xanax price drug test test xanax - xanax effects kidneys
By Anonymous, at November 16, 2012 12:35 am
ativan mg high effects of ativan - ativan vs klonopin high
By Anonymous, at November 16, 2012 3:45 pm
xanax pill xanax for travel anxiety - 2mg klonopin xanax
By Anonymous, at November 16, 2012 6:48 pm
diazepam injection buying diazepam online safe - buy diazepam online usa no prescription
By Anonymous, at November 17, 2012 10:16 pm
ativan online pharmacy lorazepam 1mg side effects - order ativan canada
By Anonymous, at November 18, 2012 12:44 am
buy xanax bars online no prescription xanax and alcohol hangover - xanax prescription online no prescription
By Anonymous, at November 18, 2012 7:52 am
ativan drug ativan and alcohol addiction - buy cheap ativan online
By Anonymous, at November 18, 2012 5:36 pm
buy ambien online best online ambien pharmacy - ambien side effects hair loss
By Anonymous, at November 19, 2012 8:27 am
soma online carisoprodol msds - carisoprodol liver effects
By Anonymous, at November 20, 2012 1:03 am
order ambien ambien generic price walmart - generic equivalent to ambien cr
By Anonymous, at November 20, 2012 4:15 am
soma carisoprodol soma drug test information - carisoprodol overdose treatment
By Anonymous, at November 20, 2012 12:19 pm
order carisoprodol somanabolic muscle maximizer bodybuilding - carisoprodol 350 mg hydrocodone
By Anonymous, at November 21, 2012 5:18 pm
valium without prescription valium drug insert - valium vs antidepressants
By Anonymous, at November 22, 2012 6:55 pm
ambien cr ambien cr side effects webmd - xanax ambien drug interactions
By Anonymous, at November 23, 2012 7:26 pm
Post a Comment
<< Home